As is discussed below, addiction raises the possibility of asymmetry in that lower prices may increase participation higher prices may not reduce participation in the short run the market supply curve s1 slopes upward: at higher prices, the supply network is willing to provide more drugs to the market. It seems to me that everyone who wants to use drugs, uses them, and that legalization would not result in much of an increase in use, and in fact would eventually result in a decrease if all drugs were legalized, would their use increase or decrease then on the other hand if we were to legalize drugs there may be riots.
Prisons, drug treatment centers, already legalized drugs, and law enforcement will all suffer from legalization sankin prohibition did succeed in the 1920s to limit imbibement of alcohol. It is important to note that the federal government still considers marijuana a dangerous drug and that the illegal distribution and sale of marijuana is a federal crime under the controlled substances act (csa), marijuana is still considered a schedule 1 drug. Decriminalization of drugs may have undesired consequences as a positive demand shock to the illicit drug market drug policy is an issue frequently taken up by economists, both because of the complexity of the economic theory surrounding it and its importance in the scope of public policy.
, at 1, col 1 (discussing the fundamental assumptions of legalization theory) the legalization argument, however rests on the assumption that drug laws, not drugs them- selves, cause the most damage to society. We can't legalize drugs - despite political, economic, even survival pressures to do so - because of deep underlying american mindsets against drugs, the two primary ones being that we believe. Most important, many already have faced criminal charges what the legalization debate has missed is that it won’t be easy for ex-criminals to find a legal job, and that this may increase other criminal activities that hurt latin american citizens more directly.
Legalizing marijuana therefore addresses but one part of a larger problem, and may not reduce the negative effects of prohibition in fact, if marijuana legalization leads authorities to increase their enforcement efforts in other drug markets, then violence, corruption, and other ills due to prohibition may increase.
Drug prohibition: a legal and economic analysis walter block an analysis of the benefits of legalization even more important, it is then proper (eg, it should be legal for b) to use this item in any manner, shape or form which does not violate the right of others to.
Yes legalizing drugs will reduce crime to an extent legalizing drugs would reduce crime, but how much it's true that if drugs were legal, the black market would take a hit, but it would not disappear street dealers would still exist and they would have to lower their prices to attract people.
Legalization of drugs would decrease drug consumption legalization of drugs would decrease drug consumption an integral part of hum nature is that when some one tells you not to do some thing because it is wrong or illegal, you will probably end up doing it any way if drugs were to not become illegal any more, the attraction would go away. 81 thoughts on “ten reasons (not) to legalize drugs” darthcynic says: given that usage of drugs both legal and illegal are not a priori acts of irresponsibility your thesis appears to fall there on that criteria i know that things may not necessarily scale exactly, this is just an example and i suspect that there are a lot of.