From sacramento — waste, fraud and abuse — also known as california's death penalty it's a colossal waste of money for arguably the state's most inefficient program california has spent an estimated $4 billion to administer capital punishment over the past 33 years and executed only 13 people that's about $308 million per execution. Unlike most editing & proofreading services, we edit for everything: grammar, spelling, punctuation, idea flow, sentence structure, & more get started now.
That being said capital punishment(cp)does not work there is a wealth of mounting evidence that proves this fact the death penalty, both in the us and around the world, is discriminatory and is used disproportionately against the poor, minorities and members of racial, ethnic and religious communities. “the death penalty is a colossal waste of money that would be better spent putting more cops on the street new jersey threw away $250 million on the death penalty over 25 years with nothing to show for it. The never-ending debate on the death penalty should include an honest and realistic portrayal — which means all the reasons capital punishment is so expensive should be examined. From a strictly financial perspective, it is hard to reach a conclusion other than this: new jersey taxpayers over the last 23 years have paid more than a quarter billion dollars on a capital punishment system that has executed no one, the report concluded. Debate on capital punishment a waste of taxpayers money pages 3 words 1,809 view full essay more essays like this: capital punishment, expensive government programs not sure what i'd do without @kibin - alfredo alvarez, student @ miami university exactly what i needed - jenna kraig, student @ ucla.
No, mount rushmore was not a waste of taxpayer money no, mount rushmore was not a waste of taxpayer money for one, mount rushmore was privately funded donations were taken, and it was paid for that way secondly, even if it was paid for by taxpayers, it has been consistently generating a whole lot of tourism dollars and attracting people from all over the nation and world.
There is also the belief that this solution is too expensive – a waste of taxpayers’ money (in fact, the cost of lifelong incarceration is actually one quarter of that incurred by a death penalty case – legally complex and with the state paying for both prosecution and defense costs.
Judd carhart, past president of the district attorneys' association said a majority of the state's district attorneys oppose capital punishment partially on the grounds that it is a waste of money better spent on other areas of law enforcement and incarceration. Column: questions for death penalty debate many death penalty proponents argue that too much of taxpayers' money goes into keeping criminals in prison the california capital punishment.